Who Is Liable When a Drunk Driver Hits You in North Hollywood?
When a drunk driver hits you in North Hollywood, the question of who is legally responsible seems straightforward. The drunk driver is at fault. But the full picture of liability in a drunk driving case often extends beyond the person behind the wheel. California law creates potential liability for the establishments that served the alcohol, for employers whose employees were drinking on the job, and in some cases for social hosts who contributed to the situation. Understanding all liable parties is essential because each one may carry insurance or assets that can be used to compensate you for your injuries.
The Drunk Driver
The driver who was intoxicated and caused the crash is the primary liable party. Their liability is established through negligence: they had a duty to drive safely, they breached that duty by driving drunk, and that breach caused your injuries. When a driver's blood alcohol concentration is at or above 0.08%, they are considered legally intoxicated under California Vehicle Code Section 23152. That BAC reading is per se evidence of intoxication, meaning the driver was impaired as a matter of law regardless of how they appeared to be functioning.
In North Hollywood, drunk driving crashes frequently occur on Lankershim Blvd and Magnolia Blvd, particularly late at night when drivers are leaving bars and restaurants in the NoHo Arts District. The 170 Freeway also sees drunk driving crashes, especially on weekends and holidays. If LAPD responded to your crash on a city street, the officer likely administered field sobriety tests and either a breathalyzer or blood draw. If CHP responded on the 170, they handled the DUI investigation.
The drunk driver faces both criminal charges and civil liability. The criminal case is handled at the Van Nuys Courthouse West and can result in jail time, fines, and license suspension. Your civil case, which seeks monetary compensation for your injuries, proceeds separately but can use evidence from the criminal investigation.
Bars, Restaurants, and the Dram Shop Question
This is where drunk driving liability gets more nuanced. California's dram shop law, Business and Professions Code Section 25602, generally protects bars and restaurants from liability for injuries caused by their intoxicated patrons. The law states that furnishing alcohol is not the proximate cause of injuries resulting from intoxication.
However, there is a critical exception. Under Section 25602.1, a licensed establishment that serves alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor (someone under 21) can be held liable for injuries that minor causes while driving drunk. If the driver who hit you was under 21 and was served at a bar or restaurant in the NoHo Arts District or anywhere else in North Hollywood, the establishment may be a liable party with its own insurance coverage.
For adult patrons, the path to dram shop liability is more limited but not entirely closed. If a bar or restaurant continued to serve a visibly intoxicated patron who then drove and caused a crash, there may be grounds for a claim depending on the specific circumstances. An experienced attorney can evaluate whether the facts of your case support this theory of liability.
North Hollywood's nightlife, concentrated in the NoHo Arts District along Lankershim Blvd and at venues like Tiki No and the Federal Bar, means that many drunk driving crashes involve drivers who were recently drinking at a local establishment. Investigating where the driver was drinking and how much they consumed before the crash is a standard part of building a drunk driving case.
Employer Liability
If the drunk driver was an employee who was drinking during a work event, on a work-related outing, or during work hours, the employer may be liable. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, employers are responsible for the negligent acts of their employees committed within the scope of employment. If a company hosted a happy hour at a NoHo Arts District bar and an employee drove drunk and caused a crash on Lankershim Blvd afterward, the employer's liability exposure is significant.
Employers can also be independently liable if they knew or should have known that the employee was intoxicated and allowed them to drive. A supervisor who watches an employee drink heavily at a company event and then lets them get in their car may have breached a duty to prevent the foreseeable harm.
Rideshare and Commercial Driver Situations
If the drunk driver was operating a vehicle in a commercial capacity, the liability analysis changes. If an Uber or Lyft driver was intoxicated while carrying a passenger or en route to a pickup and caused a crash, the rideshare company's insurance policy comes into play. That policy provides up to $1 million in coverage, far more than most personal auto insurance policies.
If the drunk driver was operating a commercial truck or delivery vehicle, the trucking or delivery company is liable for the driver's negligence and may face additional liability for failing to enforce drug and alcohol testing requirements mandated by federal regulations.
Vehicle Owner Liability
If the drunk driver was driving someone else's vehicle, the vehicle owner may bear liability under California's permissive use doctrine. If the owner knew or should have known that the driver was intoxicated and still allowed them to use the vehicle, the owner's negligence in entrusting the vehicle to an impaired driver is an independent basis for liability.
How Liability Is Proven
Proving liability in a drunk driving case relies heavily on the evidence gathered during the criminal investigation. The LAPD or CHP report will document the officer's observations of the driver's condition, the results of field sobriety tests, and the blood alcohol test results. Witness statements from people who saw the driver before the crash, including bartenders, servers, and other patrons, can establish how much the driver consumed and where.
Surveillance footage from businesses in the NoHo Arts District and along Lankershim Blvd may show the driver entering or leaving a bar, their apparent level of intoxication, and the crash itself. Credit card and bar tab records can document exactly how much alcohol the driver purchased. Cell phone records can show the driver's movements before the crash.
All of this evidence builds a complete picture of liability that extends beyond the simple fact that the driver was drunk, reaching the establishments and individuals who contributed to the situation.
The Punitive Damages Factor
Because drunk driving involves willful and conscious disregard for the safety of others, California law allows punitive damages in drunk driving cases under Civil Code Section 3294. Punitive damages are designed to punish the at-fault party and deter similar conduct. They are assessed in addition to compensatory damages and can substantially increase your total recovery.
The availability of punitive damages also affects settlement negotiations. Insurance companies know that if a drunk driving case goes to trial, a jury may impose punitive damages that far exceed the compensatory award. This knowledge gives your attorney significant leverage in negotiating a fair settlement.
What You Should Do
If you were hit by a drunk driver in North Hollywood, the first step is to make sure you have received proper medical treatment at Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center in Burbank or another appropriate facility. Then contact a North Hollywood drunk driver accident lawyer who can investigate all potential sources of liability, preserve evidence from the criminal case, and pursue every available path to compensation.
Our North Hollywood personal injury team handles drunk driving accident cases throughout the San Fernando Valley. We investigate where the driver was drinking, identify all liable parties, and pursue punitive damages when the facts support them. Consultations are free and we work on contingency. Call us today.
Injured in North Hollywood? Talk to a local attorney, no fee unless we win.
Learn about our North Hollywood personal injury services →


