Who Is Liable When a Drunk Driver Hits You in Sun Valley?
When a drunk driver hits you in Sun Valley, the question of liability seems obvious: the drunk driver is at fault. And that is true. But liability in drunk driver cases can extend beyond the impaired driver to include other parties whose actions contributed to the crash. Understanding all potential sources of liability is essential because it determines how much compensation is available and where it comes from.
The Drunk Driver: Negligence Per Se
A driver who operates a vehicle while intoxicated is liable for any injuries they cause. Under California law, driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher violates Vehicle Code Section 23152. This violation creates what is called negligence per se, meaning the driver is presumed negligent as a matter of law. You do not need to prove they were careless. The act of driving drunk is the negligence.
This is a significant legal advantage in your case. In a standard car accident, you must establish that the other driver breached their duty of care. In a drunk driver case, the breach is established by the BAC result. The police report from LAPD for crashes on San Fernando Rd and Sunland Blvd, or from CHP for crashes on the I-5, will document the driver's intoxication through field sobriety test results, breathalyzer readings, or blood draw results.
Beyond basic negligence, the drunk driver's conduct also supports a claim for punitive damages. California Civil Code Section 3294 allows punitive damages when the defendant acted with conscious disregard for the safety of others. Courts have consistently held that driving while intoxicated meets this standard.
The Employer: When the Drunk Driver Was on the Job
If the drunk driver was operating a vehicle within the scope of their employment, their employer may be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. This applies whether the driver was operating a company vehicle, making deliveries, traveling between work sites, or running a work-related errand.
Employer liability is important because commercial insurance policies typically carry much higher coverage limits than personal auto policies. A personal policy might cap at $100,000 or less. A commercial policy may provide $1 million or more in coverage. When the drunk driver's personal insurance is insufficient to cover your damages, the employer's policy can fill the gap.
The employer may also be independently liable for negligent hiring or retention. If the company hired a driver with a history of DUI convictions, or if they knew the driver had a drinking problem and allowed them to continue operating company vehicles, the employer's own negligence contributed to your injuries.
The Bar or Restaurant: Dram Shop Liability
California's dram shop laws are more restrictive than those in many other states. Under Business and Professions Code Section 25602, the furnishing of alcohol is generally not considered the proximate cause of injuries caused by an intoxicated person. This means bars and restaurants are typically not liable for serving alcohol to adults who then drive drunk.
However, there is an important exception. Under Business and Professions Code Section 25602.1, a bar, restaurant, or other establishment that serves alcohol to a person who is obviously intoxicated can be held liable if that person is a minor. Additionally, social hosts who provide alcohol to minors can face liability.
Beyond the statutory framework, some courts have recognized liability when a commercial establishment's actions go beyond simply serving alcohol. If a bar in Sun Valley actively encouraged excessive drinking, served a patron who was visibly falling-down drunk, or facilitated the patron getting behind the wheel, there may be grounds for a claim even under California's restrictive dram shop laws. Your attorney investigates the circumstances of the drunk driver's drinking to determine whether any establishment bears potential liability.
The Vehicle Owner: When the Driver Was Not in Their Own Car
If the drunk driver was operating someone else's vehicle, the vehicle owner may share liability. California's permissive use doctrine holds that a vehicle owner who allows another person to use their car can be held liable for accidents caused by that driver. If the owner knew or should have known that the driver was intoxicated before lending them the vehicle, the owner's liability is even stronger.
This scenario is more common than many people realize. Friends lending cars after parties, family members borrowing vehicles, and employees using company cars for personal errands all create situations where the vehicle owner's insurance may be available to compensate you.
Government Entities: Road Conditions That Made the Crash Worse
In some drunk driver crashes, the road conditions contributed to the severity of the accident. A missing guardrail on the I-5, a broken street light on Sunland Blvd, or a faded crosswalk on San Fernando Rd may not have caused the drunk driving, but they may have made the crash worse or prevented the victim from seeing the approaching danger.
Claims against the City of Los Angeles or Caltrans for dangerous road conditions must be filed through a government tort claim within six months of the accident. Your Sun Valley drunk driver accident attorney evaluates whether road conditions played a role and files the appropriate claims within the strict deadlines.
How Fault Is Allocated
California's pure comparative negligence system divides fault among all parties who contributed to the accident. In most drunk driver cases, the drunk driver bears the overwhelming majority of fault. But the defense will still look for ways to attribute some percentage of fault to you.
Common arguments include that you were speeding, that you failed to take evasive action, or that you were also partially impaired. While any of these factors could theoretically reduce your recovery, juries are generally unsympathetic to arguments that shift blame from a drunk driver to their victim. The drunk driver chose to break the law. Their decision to drive impaired is the primary cause of the crash.
Compensation Available in a Drunk Driver Case
Your damages include all medical expenses from emergency treatment at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center through ongoing rehabilitation, lost wages, future lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. Punitive damages, as discussed above, are an additional category available specifically because the driver was intoxicated.
Cases are filed at Van Nuys Courthouse West. The combination of compensatory and punitive damages means that drunk driver cases often produce larger recoveries than comparable sober-driver accidents.
Take Action After a Drunk Driver Crash
Do not assume the criminal justice system will take care of everything. The criminal DUI case and your civil injury case are separate proceedings. The criminal case may result in fines, jail time, or probation for the drunk driver, but it does not compensate you for your injuries. Only a civil claim or lawsuit produces the financial recovery you need to pay medical bills, replace lost income, and address pain and suffering.
Contact L&F Brown in Sun Valley for a free consultation. We investigate the crash, identify every liable party, and pursue maximum compensation, including punitive damages when the evidence supports it.
Injured in Sun Valley? Talk to a local attorney, no fee unless we win.
Learn about our Sun Valley personal injury services →
Talk to a senior attorney directly.
